I'm on an iPod so forgive me for typos or errors but I should be able to get my point across. As an administrator I've run into an interesting issue. A lot of applications weren't being checked properly and some event bent rules that only bent to an admin's will. I'm not going to name names but once me and another staff member began reviewing things by point of a community member, we found a lot of issues with most applications. Once we confronted the admin who bent rules about his own apps he got really defensive and abrasive. Eventually the matter was sorted out and things went back to normal. Or so we thought. The admin had resigned from his position for reasons I will not disclose as my personal bias will reveal itself in a very insulting manner. A bit of backstory, he helped kickstart the site, so I hear. The applications he reviewed were little to none and merely focused on his own. Suddenly he turns around as a community member and private messages me nitpicking at staff apps that we already knew we're in violation of the rules we were enforcing. Even moreso, he became highly sarcastic and arrogant, even going so far as telling me to do my job when I had just signed on from taking a break from the site for the day. I was by no means civil in my response and was very naturally highly sarcastic and rude in the public cbox as I believe in repayment of what you deal. My question to the 'D I guess now is more, "What would you have done?" Proclaiming multiple times of your massive involvement in the site creation doesn't constitute fairness if you're bending the publicly stated rules for ones you're coming up with that not many people agree with. Also this is a simple questionnaire, I don't want hostility over this.